The Wartime Presidency
A four part series that examine a “fail safe” option for saving the American Republic
Part Zero: The introduction
All through this I can’t get around the nagging feeling that we’re not thinking BIG enough.
First, I’m going to ask you to table (for now) everything you know about election law and the US Constitution. We cannot look to either for answers for what I’m about to discuss.
On Free Atlantis & other platforms; Andre, Duane & Brian Cates, Kyle (Just_Human_7), Patel Patriot, Praying Medic (Dave Hayes), Dave from the X22 report, and many others have been speculating about how the Stolen 2020 election can be returned to its rightful winner - Donald J Trump.
When this is all over, all of us are going to be partially correct in our analysis.
We are all looking at a chessboard in a box - we cannot see the individual moves, but occasionally we get to see a snapshot of the game (sometimes only a piece of the board). We must speculate about what moves occurred in between and what moves are coming next.
What I’m going to show you over a several part series of articles is a possible “last resort” or “fail safe” scenario by which Trump could come back to the White House. Please keep this in mind; this is one of several possible avenues that Trump might use to reclaim the presidency, it’s certainly not a prediction. Right now, no one can predict what might happen - not even Trump.
Why is the Constitution not relevant to this scenario?
Because it’s recently occurred to me that the US was invaded by an enemy nation in 2020 - and that invasion displaced a legitimate, legally elected government.
I know that sounds absurd but stick with me for a minute.
This invasion wasn’t in the traditional sense, with ships, aircraft, troops, and tanks; it was with social media, corrupted politicians, voting machines, a virus, and protesters.
Consider the following known enemy actions;
Successful theft of the 2020 election
Successful censoring of conservative viewpoints on mainstream social media platforms
Successful suppression of facts that were damaging to the Democratic presidential candidate, Joe Biden
Successful infiltration of MAGA in order to provoke the incident that occurred on January 6, 2021 - providing political cover to brand MAGA as a domestic terrorist threat
Successful flip of the US Senate and Successful hold of the US House of Representatives - handing over the legislative branch of government to people friendly to the enemy’s interests
Successful inauguration of Joseph R. Biden as the 46th President of the United States, a politician known to be financially and politically compromised to foreign governments
Whether kinetic or 5th Gen warfare, the result is the same - a legitimate US government was forcibly removed and a puppet government was installed in its place.
The Central Powers (Nazi Germany & Fascist Italy) in WW2 did this all the time in countries they occupied;
Hellenic State (Greece)
Government of National Salvation (roughly Serbia)
Lokot Republic (Occupied USSR)
Belarusian Central Rada (Belorussia)
Quisling’s Norwegian National Government (Norway)
Independent State of Croatia (Croatia - at the time, Yugoslavia)
Italian Social Republic (Northern Italy - established by Germany after the allied invasion of Italy and Mussolini’s government collapsed)
However, this brings us to a problem. If a puppet government is actually installed in Washington DC, why does the enemy seem to be on the losing end of events in Washington and abroad?
Failure to pass restrictive gun control legislation
Failure to pass the Build Back Better plan with the pro-communist parts intact
Failure to pass the Green New Deal
Failure to stack the Supreme Court
Failure to stop 2020 election audits
Failure to stop the AUKUS deal
Failure to stop F-35 sales to Japan
Failure to stop US military aid to Taiwan
Failure to secure mineral rights to Afghanistan
Failure to impeach President Trump - Twice
Failure to implement US vaccine passports
Failure to implement US vaccine mandates
Failure to keep Chinese products flowing into the US smoothly - hurting the Chinese economy
Failure to implement a US social credit system
Failure to stop alternative social media platforms
Failure to prevent collapse of China’s real estate market
Failure to demolish the wall Trump built
Failure to close GITMO
Failure to protect their incumbents from losing to Republican challengers (save one exception - Gavin Newsom in California)
Failure to maintain control of the US educational system (they’re losing control rapidly)
Failure to stop the Ghislane Maxwell trial - make no mistake, this is a broadside against the USS Deep State, things will be made public in this trial that the public was never meant to know
Failure to stop the Durham investigation
Failure to stop courts from issuing preliminary injunctions that stop vaccination mandates
Failure to successfully prosecute Kyle Rittenhouse for murder, which would have effectively removed the 2A right to use deadly force to defend one’s life
Failure to expose or circumvent President Trump’s PEADS or EO’s that he left behind for the Biden administration
Failure to bring an indictment against Trump
Failure to prevent Americans from uniting under a pro-constitution political banner
Future - Failure to hold the house and senate
Future - Failure to protect their incumbent District Attorneys from challengers
Future - Failure to protect Roe v. Wade from SCOTUS
Future - Failure to prevent SCOTUS from expanding the 2A - the case will involve the question of “bear” as in the freedom to leave one’s house with a weapon in case of confrontation, with no need to “prove” the odds of such confrontation to the government
Ladies and gentlemen - look at that list of fail!
If this is a puppet government, this is the absolute worst and ineffective one I’ve ever seen.
It’s almost if China would have done better had they decided to stay out of the 2020 election and left Trump where he was. (Hint: that’s classic Trump - when dealing with Donald J Trump, always take the first deal and negotiate. You never tell this man no if you want to win) We see a contradiction here;
We know the 2020 election was stolen
The people who stole it aren’t winning - they’re losing!
I like contradictions. They’re always an indicator that you’re right over something interesting. Contradictions are a cheerleading squad that pump up your enthusiasm to keep digging in your research and reasoning.
Consider this with me;
Ordinarily, a successful invasion and installation of a puppet government would mean the invaders would get whatever they wanted.
But here’s the thing - they’re not. The fact that China and Iran keep losing right along with the Neofacists is a huge data point. It begs the question;
If their victory was complete, why do they keep losing?
Here’s a possible answer;
The invasion was through subterfuge, corruption, propaganda, and electronic means - not physical force with soldiers and weapons.
Therefore it’s inherently unstable.
This wasn’t a traditional invasion; it was done electronically and through politics and media. As a result, there’s no enemy holding force here in the US. Oh there are enemy agents, that’s a foregone conclusion - what I’m talking about is a holding force with enough equipment and soldiers to occupy all 50 states. That force doesn’t exist. The enemy’s strength is also his weakness.
If states and American citizens simply refuse to cooperate or refuse to do what they’re told - the enemy can’t really do anything about it. Remember there aren’t soldiers here, so if Texas decides to defy the puppet administration - China cannot send an armored division to Austin and arrest a bunch of people and stomp those Texans back into line.
If this premise is true, then this situation has no precedent in US history. We’ve been looking to the Constitution to provide a roadmap and a way out of this quagmire, and it can provide some answers of how we might emerge; but, the Constitution ISN’T the place to look for HOW Trump gets the White House back.
If that’s the case, what we’re seeing goes far beyond a presidential election. If I’m reading the situation correctly, Trump has hinted that the world is at war.
Yes ladies and gentlemen, World War 3 started in late 2019.
In this series of articles, we are going to try to answer the following questions;
If we can’t look to the US Constitution, where do we turn?
How will the legitimate US government be reinstated?
How do we emerge from devolution?
Will there be trials?
We will be examining these topics in future articles. I thank you for your interest, and look forward to sharing my thoughts with you.
Please consider leaving a comment below.
Until next time,
There should be, or needs to be a provision in our constitution that states that ANY elected or appointed official that does not serve the AMERICAN PEOPLE can and will be removed from said office and tried for treason. This should be enforced, strongly enforced.
I absolutely believe Trump devolved the government. Devolution is the only concept of which I’m aware that exists without apparent contradictions in current events.
It’s absolutely imperative that whatever actions are taken, it’s done 100% by-the-book to the degree that any action undertaken will survive the harshest future legal scrutiny. Whatever mechanisms are used to ‘right the ship’, they need to be legally unshakeable, especially if Trump ends up back in the White House.
As SLAG points out, the Constitution offers us no clear path. Yet I think it still plays a central role, specifically through the MIL oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.
The military is the only way to restore America.
Without going into the weeds speculating how it will play out, at least from 100,000ft there’s no shortage of possibilities that could provide proof of some level of corruption and foreign control:
-The Durham and Weiss investigations
-The Maxwell trial
-The Juicy Sommelier trial
-Nuremburg 2.0 and the exposure of Fauci, Daszak, Pfizer and the medical-industrial complex
The problem is that a large percentage of the public will not see the proof because of MSM suppression.
I have no idea what event or happening will bring the MIL out of the shadows but I think it would need to create a Constitutional Crisis. Anything less would have the potential of MIL law being second-guessed.
What if election fraud perpetrated by enemies FOREIGN and domestic is proven on a Congressional level? Having these cases wind through the states feels like it will take an excessively long time but maybe that’s what needs to happen.
Unless someone like Eric Coomer has been flipped. What if he confesses and brings the receipts that among other things directly implicate the CCP?
No matter how the fraud is revealed, elections will be nullified and as @Andre points out, unrecoverable. MIL will have no choice but to step in because, outwardly, Continuity of Government will be jeopardized. MIL will then set into motion the process for new elections.
One more thing. The MIL take control of the MSM - hold that thought for a moment.
The important part of this spitball is that MIL will be publicly in control until the new elections. I don’t think this necessarily means that devolution will be revealed, however. I think the notion that the Biden admin has been presiding over and owns this shitshow is critical.
Flashback: On June 12, 2015, just four days before Trump announced his candidacy, the DoD released the first edition of its Law of War Manual. Until then, DoD had never put forth a DoD-wide manual concerning the Law of War. While different branches had their own manuals, a comprehensive manual didn’t exist. I don’t think the timing of DJT’s announcement was coincidental. It’s almost as if the act of publishing/formalizing MIL process under the previous admin was a precondition for Trump announcing his candidacy
It’s a LONG manual - almost 1200 pages. Chapter 11 Military Occupation (just 84 pages!) is the most relevant section. .
Before jumping to a few specifics relevant to SLAG’s questions, I want to explain why I think this entire concept is legally applicable.
According to 126.96.36.199, the law of belligerent (military) occupation does NOT apply to liberation of friendly territory (the US). It defines the administration of liberated friendly territory as being governed by a civil affairs agreement between the MIL and the government of the friendly territory.
However, it further explains (and the footnotes add clarity) that if a civil affairs agreement isn’t possible due to other circumstance (like having an unrecoverable election), a military government by a belligerent power is a legal option.
The importance of respecting as much of the occupied state’s existing laws is woven into the fabric of this Manual. As such, I think any law promulgated by MIL as the occupying power will necessarily be congruent with the Constitution.
OK - on to three interesting sections/sub-sections about the breadth of authority vs normal civilian law.
-11.5.2 MIL has duty to respect the laws in force in the Country unless it impacts their security.
-11.7.2 MIL has the authority to censor any and all forms of media (footnote re: 1A is relevant.)
-188.8.131.52 Notwithstanding the obligation to respect the laws of the Country, MIL has the authority to change municipal laws (think sanctuary cities, for example).
To the last of SLAG’s questions: Will there be trials?
184.108.40.206 and 220.127.116.11 provide MIL with the authority to suspend ordinary (non-criminal) courts if they are corrupt, establish MIL courts to enforce civil laws (not just MIL laws) AND remove judges and prosecutors from office (see footnote - Hey, Binger and Fatlock, pay attention!)
Section 11.11 - Criminal Court is an extension of 11.10 Ordinary Court. It establishes further procedures to remain aligned with the occupied territory’s laws and the Geneva Convention (GC). I think this section would only apply to foreign nationals (not US citizens) in uniform as they would be defined as Protected Persons under the GC.
Not sure, I don’t believe US citizens who committed treason (spies or otherwise aided the enemy) are subject to GC protections and would likely face military tribunals and the death penalty.
I believe Antifa will be declared enemy combatants. I don’t believe they would be afforded GC protections as US citizens, .
Tribunals are very different from civilian court. The judges are the de facto jury, rules of evidence are different, and the defense has very little leeway in terms of delays and shenanigans. Tribunals are def expedited justice.
I wonder if MIL will publicly take charge before Durham or Weiss move into trial phase and the targets find themselves facing a MIL tribunal? That would be interesting, indeed.
I’m unclear as to whether this occupation would be solely at a Federal level, or if the MIL would also consider each state as occupied territory. I’m inclined to believe it could include states as occupied territory, which would allow the MIL to clean house and change election laws in blue states.
I think it’s critical that MIL occupation would be initiated under a non-Trump admin because optics are important.
I think the entirety of Chapter 11 provides a framework that ensures all actions will withstand any level of future scrutiny, while providing very generous leeway for MIL to
-Take control of public messaging
-Weed out corrupt officials
-Change corrupt laws.
-Mete out justice to traitors
THE BEST IS YET TO COME