The Future of The Wartime Presidency…

Greetings all.

First, I thank you for your readership, your subscriptions, and your support.

Also, it is my plan to continue writing. I love doing it and I love to share that ability with the community - to give something back.

In that vein, I must speak my mind about something that’s been troubling me for a while now - that is the treatment by some in this community of my friend, Biernutz _71.

I’ve spoken with him personally and together we’ve had a hard time figuring out exactly what he’s done or what he’s guilty of. All I can think of is his intention to question devolution and promote a new substack series - Reconstitution by 17th SOG.

As the author of devolution will tell you, and has told you, devolution is a theory that fits the available facts. That’s reasonable. However, just because a theory is popular does not make it immune to examination. If that examination finds flaws, the theory should change or be replaced.

Reconstitution brings up questions in my mind - is devolution still the right answer to the available data? I am not as sure as I once was.

I am also aware that there may be some pushback from me taking a public stand. I welcome that - because standing up for a good friend is the right thing to do, and I do not wish to lose my freedom to question the popular narrative.

I’ll be taking a break for a while, as I have to focus on my book and on other projects, but I promise you all:

This won’t be the last you hear from SLAG.

***** Addendum *****

Nothing in any of my work should be construed as a personal or professional attack on Patel Patriot.

I greatly respect the work, research, and everything he’s given to this community of patriots. I also believe that his theory of devolution has merit, his research is painstaking, and it is all deserving of careful consideration by the community.

There is much work to be done, and all of us are needed. Let us as a community heal this rift and move on with taking our country back.

SLAG